Four Gospels | Why four accounts of the life of Jesus Christ?

Historical reliability of the Gospels

dating of the 4 gospels

Matthew tells us of the question the scribes and Pharisees had over the fact the disciples of Jesus did "not wash their hands when they eat bread" Matt. Read more Read less. Through the main body of the Synoptic tradition, I believe, we have in most cases direct access to the teaching and ministry of Jesus as it was remembered from the beginning of the transmission process which often predates Easter and so fairly direct access to the ministry and teaching of Jesus through the eyes and ears of those who went about with him. Price an atheist who denies the existence of Jesus agrees that this perspective runs against the views of the majority of scholars: Nazareth did not even exist in the first century?

Destruction of the temple in A.D. 70, Luke and Acts

Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties. The Ebionim seem to have worked from a version of Matthew in Aramaic, that excluded birth and post resurrection stories. Translated from German edition. The Gospels explain Jewish customs to the reader and get the geography of the area wrong, indicating that they were not written for a Jewish audience, nor were they written by someone who lived in the area. Tertullian, De Spetaculis View or edit your browsing history.

This fragment of the book of John has been dated to about AD The date does not come from Carbon dating as it is so small, no one would be willing to sacrifice part of the manuscript. The date comes from the type of writing and the material used. It is approximate plus or minus about 10 years. Bottom line, we do not know the exact dates the gosples were written. There are several lines of evidence used. One is the earliest dates these books are quoted from.

All four gospels are quoted in patristic writings a technical term which means writings by the early church "fathers. Almost all scholars will give a significantly earlier date to the four books, although some put the book of John as late as the 80s AD. A general consensus of conservative scholars puts Mark at about AD Some even put Mark in the 50s AD. These are obviously rough approximations. Such dates are based on guesses about which authors relied on the others.

Matthew and Luke relate prophecies of the destruction of Jerusalem which happened in AD 70 which seems to support these books being published before AD John shows evidence of response to gnostic ideas, likely implying a later date of writing. The arguments for the date of writing of these books can get rather obtuse. The mother might be able to tell you the color of the cars involved and the number of occupants.

Their little boy witnessing the same accident might not know about the make or model of the cars, but he might be able to tell you about the puppy dog who was almost hit, while his little sister would only tell you about the baby doll that got thrown out of the first car at the time of impact.

Now, who told the truth? They all told the truth, but from different viewpoints. The gospel writers all tell us the same basic story about the life of Christ. However, while one writer might choose to emphasize the parables of Jesus, another writer might skip over the parables and dwell on the nature and character of our Lord. Putting all four gospel accounts together gives us a fuller and richer portrait of the life and work of Jesus the Messiah. The emblems are variously distributed among the gospel writers, but a common allocation is that the man stands for Mark, which is the plainest, the most straightforward and the most human of the gospels; the lion stands for Matthew, for he specially saw Jesus as the Messiah and the Lion of the tribe of Judah; the ox stands for Luke, because it is the animal of service and sacrifice, and Luke saw Jesus as the great servant of men and the universal sacrifice for all mankind; the eagle stands for John, because it alone of all living creatures can look straight into the sun and not be dazzled, and John has the most penetrating gaze of all the New Testament writers into the eternal mysteries and the eternal truths and the very mind of God.

Many people find themselves closer to God and to Jesus Christ in John than in any other book in the world. Matthew was a Galilean Jew and is often referred to as "Matthew the tax collector" Matt. It is the unanimous consent of the "church fathers" such as Irenaeus, Origien, Eusebius and Jerome that Matthew wrote his gospel in Hebrew and it was later translated into Greek.

While Matthew does not state the purpose of his book like John did John Some have commented that the gospel of Matthew was written by a Jew, about a Jew, to other Jews -- and this is certainly the case. Try to picture a Greek opening the gospel of Matthew for the first time.

Within the first few verses he would read of the genealogy of Christ. Among the Jews this would have seemed both logical and appropriate, but to a Greek it would have been unintelligible. He would also read of Jesus being the Messiah -- a term which no Greek would have been able to fully comprehend.

The point is that the gospel of Matthew was never intended for a Greek audience. There are more than forty Old Testament passages quoted in Matthew in connection with even the minor events of the life of Christ. Matthew would often mention some minor detail in the life of Christ and then go on to show that the event was a fulfillment of prophecy.

Matthew explains that Christ was born of a virgin "that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet" Matt. The chief priests told Herod that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem, "for thus it is written by the prophet" Matt.

When Herod ordered the slaughter of the innocent children, it was seen as a fulfillment of "what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet" Matt. John the Baptist prepared the way for Jesus, "for this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah" Matt. Christ began His ministry in " Capernaum , which is by the sea, in the regions of Zebulun and Naphtali, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet" Matt.

Even the teaching method of Jesus was a matter of prophecy. Matthew explains that "Jesus spoke to the multitude in parables; and without a parable He did not speak to them, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying: The death of Christ on Calvary's cross was also a matter of prophecy, and Matthew goes into detail to explain this fact.

Christ was betrayed into the hands of the enemy for thirty pieces of silver, as prophesied by Jeremiah Matt. When He was crucified, the soldiers "divided His garments, casting lots, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet: Even His words on the cross were a matter of prophecy, for there in agony He quoted the words of the Psalm of the Cross, "'Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?

The gospel of Mark was written to a Roman audience. If one verse could reflect the message of the book, it would be this: In the book of Mark Christ is presented as the ideal servant.

Iamges: dating of the 4 gospels

dating of the 4 gospels

It is the unanimous consent of the "church fathers" such as Irenaeus, Origien, Eusebius and Jerome that Matthew wrote his gospel in Hebrew and it was later translated into Greek.

dating of the 4 gospels

Quest of the historical Jesus.

dating of the 4 gospels

However, if we also consider the evidence of papyrus fragments and references to Mark in other historical works, we don't see any evidence to suggest Mark was written at such an early date. In discussing the word "Theophilus," Strong's asserts that it is a single individual to whom Luke is addressing his gospel and Acts. That he was crucified is as sure as anything historical can ever be, since both Josephus and Tacitus When were the Gospels written? As one glaring example of this dating of the 4 gospels, it is claimed that Matthew was recording events he himself had witnessed, but the datinb attributed to him begins before he had been dating of the 4 gospels by Jesus and speaks of Matthew in the third person…. Dunn believes that "the earliest tradents within the Christian churches [were] preservers more than innovators